data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49367/4936708a390759c7aa5b7a91fcce0ea5b18bf9b5" alt=""
In the ultimately futile three hundred year old debate that has raged regarding ‘high ‘ and ‘ low art’, such ‘ low’ art as these pulp fiction covers, is often derided for the poor quality of the draughtsmanship, whereas the simple truth is that for pure draughtsmanship, as opposed to piercing originality or ‘ vision’, this art is often more impressive than that of many ‘ high’ artists. Next time you visit Tate Britain wander around the many rooms devoted to Turner and study the groups of figures that inhabit the foregrounds of his huge oil landscapes. You might be surprised at how inept our greatest painter could be at depicting the human figure.
Then return to the work of ‘low’ book illustrators and marvel at how well most of them could draw. [RMH]
No comments:
Post a Comment